Forward Missed Saturday's FA Cup Match Amongst MLS Rumors
Josh Sargent's future at Norwich City has become one of the January transfer window's most contentious sagas. Toronto FC has tabled an £13.4 million bid for the American striker, triggering a dramatic standoff between player and club.
The situation escalated over the weekend when Sargent texted manager Philippe Clement on Saturday night, declaring himself unavailable for Sunday's FA Cup tie against Walsall due to "transfer things in his head." Norwich went on to secure a comfortable 5-1 victory without him, but Clement made his displeasure clear. "This is obviously not something we want and will have consequences," the Belgian manager stated, emphasizing that the club had made it "really clear" that Sargent wouldn't be departing this month.
The 25-year-old from O'Fallon, Missouri, reportedly sees the Toronto move as crucial for his international ambitions. With the World Cup scheduled for this summer in North America, Sargent is desperate to force his way back into Mauricio Pochettino's USMNT plans. His international prospects have dimmed considerably—he hasn't scored for his country since 2019 across 17 appearances and was omitted from squads in October and November.
Sargent's season has been a tale of two halves. After a blistering start with six goals by August's end, he endured a three-month drought before finally scoring again in December. Norwich's fortunes have mirrored his struggles, with the club languishing in the Championship relegation zone, just a point from safety.
The standoff has left Norwich's hierarchy considering disciplinary action, potentially excluding Sargent from first-team training. Sporting director Ben Knapper backs Clement's hardline stance, viewing the striker as essential to their survival battle. Toronto's bid falls significantly short of the £23 million package Wolfsburg negotiated last summer, giving Norwich further resolve to resist. With Sargent contracted until 2028, the Canaries hold the upper hand in this increasingly bitter dispute.
No comments:
Post a Comment